EMPLOYEE’S DEVELOPMENT AS A FACTOR OF COMPANY’S SUCCESS AT DYNAMIC MARKET - Polish Journal of Management Studies

Search
Polish Journal of Management Studies
 ISSN 2081-7452
Go to content

Main menu:

EMPLOYEE’S DEVELOPMENT AS A FACTOR OF COMPANY’S SUCCESS AT DYNAMIC MARKET

Abstracts > Vol 10.2

EMPLOYEES DEVELOPMENT AS A FACTOR OF COMPANYS SUCCESS AT DYNAMIC MARKET
Lis T., Bajdor P., Ładyga M.

Abstract: Changes in the modern enterprise are necessary. This follows directly from market volatility. The effectiveness of the organization is determined by the efficiency of its employees. Therefore, the improvement of the company is primarily related to the improvement of its human resources. This applies to all employees, regardless of its role and position in the organizational structure.

Key words:
employee, advancement, organizational structure, organizational culture, changes


Introduction

Although management is a relatively young science, traces of its practice can be found in antiquity. As noted by R.W. Griffin, while building the pyramids, Egyptians successfully, had been using the functions of planning, organizing and controlling. In turn, the famous Macedonian king Alexander the Great, during the military campaigns, had based on military coordination, using the staff organization. In the Roman Empire, to improve communication processes and controls, an effective organizational structure had been implemented. Its features and concepts can also be found in the activities of the Sumerians, Babylonians, Chinese, Greeks, and the Venetians. Also Socrates, Plato and Alfarabi wrote about the solutions used in the management (Dwiwedula and Bredillet, 2010).
It should be noted that virtually every human activity, both in private life and professional life, is associated with a constant planning, organizing, controlling, monitoring, implementation, etc., simply the management. In relation to work life man/employee manages: its workplace, group of people, department, subsidiary, company. It depends on its position in the organizational structure. Every human activity associated with its normal functioning always brings some certain results (Barczak et al., 2009).
They may be intended and expected, but also more or less vary from it. At the same time, each activity enables individuals to gain: knowledge, experience, skills. It can be said that, with time passes, he acquires competence in his operations. Competence, whose source is personal life only are limited.

With communication, man has the ability to acquire and use "work effects" of other individuals. The desire, aptitude, capabilities, and the ability to assimilate the experience from all sources is an essential part of building self-esteem and optimizing any action taken. This applies to both, private and work life (Quinn et al., 2007; Krajčovičová et al., 2013).

full version

Summary

Management as a generic term related to organizing, conducting, controlling, decision and supervision of "life", can be assigned to each person. However, the current understanding of management is associated almost exclusively with economic activity. Whether it should be noted that it is assigned to man. Since it depends on his character and produced effects. Thus, the improvement of the organization is actually a derivative of improving employee. The aim is not only about the people on the highest levels of the structure, but every employee in the company. On the effects of work organization are made up results of work of each of its elements.
Today's markets are characterized by high dynamics of change. In fact, such an undertaking aspirations of gaining a competitive advantage must constantly adapt and evolve. To make this possible it is necessary to have adequate staff. It must be characterized by their possession of much knowledge as possible and desired skills. They must also be able to cooperate.
Optimizing company human potential depends directly on the management team. It is its mission to manage human resources. In its scope includes: selection and rotation of workers, the introduction of incentive, training, etc. Managers must ensure adequate working conditions. They also need to create a platform allowing free exchange and dissemination of: knowledge, skills and experience. Thanks to all employees become one compact assembly, whose primary objective is to achieve market success.
The ability to make optimal use of both individual and collective effects of work, requires employees and maintain an adequate organizational structure and culture. Culture is to: motivate employees realize their own advantages and opportunities to realize their role, create relationships based on trust. Optimization of the technical aspects of creating relationships in the enterprise, is a task introduced organizational structure. One of the most important features that should have is flexibility.
The functioning of the organization, like every human life, takes place under conditions of constant change and uncertainty upcoming events. The role of management is here to organize and maintenance work to ensure optimality of obtained results. This involves continuous modification of the current state, in order to adapt to the future. It is necessary to have extensive knowledge about the company and its environment. Also important is the ability to cooperate, capture weak signals, high-speed matching facts, organize work in a way that allows the maximum use of the potential of all employees.
An essential component of the manager's work is a reality of continuous improvement, gaining experience and gaining knowledge.


References

Achim I.M., Dragolea L., Balan G., The importance of employee motivation to increase organizational performance, "Annales Universitatis Apulensis, Series Oeconomica", 15(2).
Barczak B., Bartusik K., Kozina A., 2009, Modele strukturalne organizacji uczącej się, [In:] Doskonalenie struktur organizacyjnych przedsiębiorstw w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy, (Ed.) A. Stabryła, C. H. Beck, Warszawa.
Burnes B.,2014, Understanding Resistance to Change
Building on Coach and French, "Journal of Change Management", 3.
Cichosz M., 2010, Lojalność klienta a logistyka firm usługowych, Wydawnictwo Szkoły Głównej Handlowej, Warszawa.
Dale B., Cooper C., 1992, Total quality and human resources: an executive guide, Blackwell, Oxford.
Dwiwedula R., Bredillet Ch.N., 2010, Profiling work motivtion of project workers, "International Journal of Project Management", 28(2).
Elastyczność organizacji, 2008, (Ed.), R. Krupski, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego, Wrocław.
Gloet M., Berrell M., 2003, The dual paradigm nature of knowledge management: implications for achieving quality outcomes in human resource management," Journal of Knowledge Management", 7(1).
Hales C., 1986, What do managers do? A critical review of the evidence, "Journal of Management Studies", 23(1).
Krajčovičová K., Cagáňová D., Čambál M., (2013), Competency models utilization in industrial enterprises, "Advanced Materials Research", 655.
Materska K., 2006, Wiedza w organizacjach, Prolegomena do zarządzania wiedzą, [In:] Informacja w sieci. Problemy, metody, technologie, Wydawnictwo Stowarzyszenia Bibliotekarzy Polskich, Warszawa.
Mikuła B., 2006, Dostosowanie systemu zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi do wymagań zarządzania wiedzą, „E-mentor", 4(16).
Mintzberg H., 2012, Zarządzanie, Wolters Kluwer Polska Sp. z o.o., Warszawa.
Mroziewski M., 2006, Style kierowania i zarządzania, Difin, Warszawa.
Orr L.M., Bush V.D., Vorhies D.W., 2011, Leveraging firm level marketing with marketing employee development, "Journal of Business Research", 64(10).
Panasiewicz L., 2010, Kulturowe uwarunkowania konkurencyjności opartej na informacji, [In:] Zarządzanie zasobami informacyjnymi w warunkach nowej gospodarki, (Ed.) R. Borowiecki, J. Czekaj, Difin, Warszawa.
Penc J., 2005, Sztuka skutecznego zarządzania, Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Kraków.
Penc J., 2008, Decyzje i zmiany w organizacji, W poszukiwaniu skutecznych sposobów działania, Difin, Warszawa.
Quinn R.E., Faerman S.R., Thompson M.P., McGrath M.R., 2007, Profesjonalne zarządzanie, PWE, Warszawa.
Tabor J., 2008, Wykorzystanie metod rozwoju kompetencji do kształtowania możliwości technologicznych w małych i średnich przedsiębiorstwach, [In:] Współczene problemy zarządzania przedsiębiorstwami w gospodarce rynkowej, (Eds) H. Howaniec, W. Waszkielwicz, Wyd. Akad. Techn.-Humanistycznej, Bielsko -Biała.
Tung A., Baird K., Schoch H., 2014, The relationship between organisational factor and the effectivenesss of environmental management, "Journal of International Management", 1.


ROZWÓJ PRACOWNIKA CZYNNIKIEM SUKCESU PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWA NA DYNAMICZNYM RYNKU


Streszczenie:
Zmiany we współczesnym przedsiębiorstwie są koniecznością. Wynika to bezpośrednio ze zmienności rynku. O efektywności funkcjonowania organizacji decyduje efektywność jej pracowników. W związku z tym doskonalenie przedsiębiorstwa jest przede wszystkim związane z doskonaleniem jego kadr. Dotyczy to wszystkich pracowników, niezależnie od roli i pozycji w strukturze organizacyjnej.

Słowa kluczowe:
pracownik, doskonalenie, struktura organizacyjna, kultura organizacyjna, zmiany

员工的发展作为公司的成功在动态市场的一个因素

摘要:在现代企业中的变化是必要的。这直接遵循市场的波动。由其雇员的效率决定本组织的效率。因此,改善本公司的主要原因是其人力资源的改进。这适用于所有雇员,不论其作用和组织结构中的位置。
关键字: 员工、 地位、 组织结构、 组织文化、 更改


 
Back to content | Back to main menu